您好!欢迎来到首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院官方网站!

高分SCI文摘

您所在的位置: 首页 >>胸科图书馆 >>信息推送 >>高分SCI文摘 >>2019年

高分SCI文摘

2019年

No.24

来源:tushuguan 发布时间:2020-03-13 浏览次数:
字号: + - 14

Medical Abstracts

Keyword: lung cancer

1. Cancer Cell. 2020 Jan 13;37(1):37-54.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.11.003. Epub

2019 Dec 26.

CDK7 Inhibition Potentiates Genome Instability Triggering Anti-tumor Immunity in

Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Zhang H(1), Christensen CL(2), Dries R(3), Oser MG(2), Deng J(4), Diskin B(5), Li

F(4), Pan Y(4), Zhang X(6), Yin Y(6), Papadopoulos E(4), Pyon V(4), …

Author information:

(1)Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Medical

Center, New York, NY 10016, USA. Electronic address: hua.zhang@nyulangone.org.

(2)Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

02215, USA.

(3)Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

02215, USA.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 7 (CDK7) is a central regulator of the cell cycle and

gene transcription. However, little is known about its impact on genomic

instability and cancer immunity. Using a selective CDK7 inhibitor, YKL-5-124, we

demonstrated that CDK7 inhibition predominately disrupts cell-cycle progression

and induces DNA replication stress and genome instability in small cell lung

cancer (SCLC) while simultaneously triggering immune-response signaling. These

tumor-intrinsic events provoke a robust immune surveillance program elicited by

T cells, which is further enhanced by the addition of immune-checkpoint blockade.

Combining YKL-5-124 with anti-PD-1 offers significant survival benefit in

multiple highly aggressive murine models of SCLC, providing a rationale for new

combination regimens consisting of CDK7 inhibitors and immunotherapies.

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.11.003

PMID: 31883968

2. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):261-270. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30690-4. Epub

2019 Dec 11.

Entrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: integrated

analysis of three phase 1-2 trials.

Drilon A(1), Siena S(2), Dziadziuszko R(3), Barlesi F(4), Krebs MG(5), Shaw

AT(6), de Braud F(7), Rolfo C(8), Ahn MJ(9), Wolf J(10), Seto T(11),…

Author information:

(1)Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Memorial Sloan Kettering

Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

(2)Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano,

Milan, Italy; Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda,

Milan, Italy.

(3)Institute of Cancer Sciences, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.

Erratum in

Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):e70.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent gene fusions, such as ROS1 fusions, are oncogenic drivers

of various cancers, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Up to 36% of

patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC have brain metastases at the diagnosis

of advanced disease. Entrectinib is a ROS1 inhibitor that has been designed to

effectively penetrate and remain in the CNS. We explored the use of entrectinib

in patients with locally advanced or metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC.

METHODS: We did an integrated analysis of three ongoing phase 1 or 2 trials of

entrectinib (ALKA-372-001, STARTRK-1, and STARTRK-2). The efficacy-evaluable

population included adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with locally advanced or

metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC who received entrectinib at a dose of at

least 600 mg orally once per day, with at least 12 months' follow-up. All

patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and

previous cancer treatment (except for ROS1 inhibitors) was allowed. The primary

endpoints were the proportion of patients with an objective response (complete or

partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

version 1.1) and duration of response, and were evaluated by blinded independent

central review. The safety-evaluable population for the safety analysis included

all patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC in the three trials who received at

least one dose of entrectinib (irrespective of dose or duration of follow-up).

These ongoing studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02097810

(STARTRK-1) and NCT02568267 (STARTRK-2), and EudraCT, 2012-000148-88

(ALKA-372-001).

FINDINGS: Patients were enrolled in ALKA-372-001 from Oct 26, 2012, to March 27,

2018; in STARTRK-1 from Aug 7, 2014, to May 10, 2018; and in STARTRK-2 from Nov

19, 2015 (enrolment is ongoing). At the data cutoff date for this analysis (May

31, 2018), 41 (77%; 95% CI 64-88) of 53 patients in the efficacy-evaluable

population had an objective response. Median follow-up was 15·5 monhts (IQR

13·4-20·2). Median duration of response was 24·6 months (95% CI 11·4-34·8). In

the safety-evaluable population, 79 (59%) of 134 patients had grade 1 or 2

treatment-related adverse events. 46 (34%) of 134 patients had grade 3 or 4

treatment-related adverse events, with the most common being weight increase (ten

[8%]) and neutropenia (five [4%]). 15 (11%) patients had serious

treatment-related adverse events, the most common of which were nervous system

disorders (four [3%]) and cardiac disorders (three [2%]). No treatment-related

deaths occurred.

INTERPRETATION: Entrectinib is active with durable disease control in patients

with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC, and is well tolerated with a manageable safety

profile, making it amenable to long-term dosing in these patients. These data

highlight the need to routinely test for ROS1 fusions to broaden therapeutic

options for patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC.

FUNDING: Ignyta/F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30690-4

PMID: 31838015

3. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1691-1701. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30655-2. Epub 2019 Oct 25.

Lorlatinib in advanced ROS1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre,

open-label, single-arm, phase 1-2 trial.

Shaw AT(1), Solomon BJ(2), Chiari R(3), Riely GJ(4), Besse B(5), Soo RA(6), Kao

S(7), Lin CC(8), Bauer TM(9), Clancy JS(10), Thurm H(11), Martini JF(11), Peltz

G(12), Abbattista A(13), Li S(11), Ou SI(14).

Author information:

(1)Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address:

ashaw1@mgh.harvard.edu.

(2)Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

(3)Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia,

Perugia, Italy.

BACKGROUND: Lorlatinib is a potent, brain-penetrant, third-generation tyrosine

kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets ALK and ROS1 with preclinical activity

against most known resistance mutations in ALK and ROS1. We investigated the

antitumour activity and safety of lorlatinib in advanced, ROS1-positive

non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS: In this open-label, single-arm, phase 1-2 trial, we enrolled patients

(aged ≥18 years) with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced

ROS1-positive NSCLC, with or without CNS metastases, with an Eastern Cooperative

Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less (≤1 for phase 1 only) from 28

hospitals in 12 countries worldwide. Lorlatinib 100 mg once daily (escalating

doses of 10 mg once daily to 100 mg twice daily in phase 1 only) was given orally

in continuous 21-day cycles until investigator-determined disease progression,

unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death. The primary endpoint was

overall and intracranial tumour response, assessed by independent central review.

Activity endpoints were assessed in patients who received at least one dose of

lorlatinib. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov,

NCT01970865.

FINDINGS: Between Jan 22, 2014, and Oct 2, 2016, we assessed 364 patients, of

whom 69 with ROS1-positive NSCLC were enrolled. 21 (30%) of 69 patients were

TKI-naive, 40 (58%) had previously received crizotinib as their only TKI, and

eight (12%) had previously received one non-crizotinib ROS1 TKI or two or more

ROS1 TKIs. The estimated median duration of follow-up for response was 21·1

months (IQR 15·2-30·3). 13 (62%; 95% CI 38-82) of 21 TKI-naive patients and 14

(35%; 21-52) of 40 patients previously treated with crizotinib as their only TKI

had an objective response. Intracranial responses were achieved in seven (64%;

95% CI 31-89) of 11 TKI-naive patients and 12 (50%; 29-71) of 24 previous

crizotinib-only patients. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse

events were hypertriglyceridaemia (13 [19%] of 69 patients) and

hypercholesterolaemia (ten [14%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events

occurred in five (7%) of 69 patients. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

INTERPRETATION: Lorlatinib showed clinical activity in patients with advanced

ROS1-positive NSCLC, including those with CNS metastases and those previously

treated with crizotinib. Because crizotinib-refractory patients have few

treatment options, lorlatinib could represent an important next-line targeted

agent.

FUNDING: Pfizer.

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30655-2

PMID: 31669155

4. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1655-1669. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30634-5. Epub 2019 Oct 4.

Ramucirumab plus erlotinib in patients with untreated, EGFR-mutated, advanced

non-small-cell lung cancer (RELAY): a randomised, double-blind,

placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Nakagawa K(1), Garon EB(2), Seto T(3), Nishio M(4), Ponce Aix S(5), Paz-Ares

L(5), Chiu CH(6), Park K(7), Novello S(8), Nadal E(9), Imamura F(10), Yoh K(11),

Shih JY(12), Au KH(13), Moro-Sibilot D(14), Enatsu S(15), Zimmermann A(16),

Frimodt-Moller B(17), Visseren-Grul C(18), Reck M(19); RELAY Study Investigators.

Author information:

(1)Department of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka,

Japan. Electronic address: nakagawa@med.kindai.ac.jp.

(2)David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles,

Translational Research in Oncology US Network, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

(3)National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.

BACKGROUND: Dual blockade of the EGFR and VEGF pathways in EGFR-mutated

metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is supported by preclinical and

clinical data, yet the approach is not widely implemented. RELAY assessed

erlotinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) standard of care, plus

ramucirumab, a human IgG1 VEGFR2 antagonist, or placebo in patients with

untreated EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC.

METHODS: This is a worldwide, double-blind, phase 3 trial done in 100 hospitals,

clinics, and medical centres in 13 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18

years or older (20 years or older in Japan and Taiwan) at the time of study

entry, had stage IV NSCLC, with an EGFR exon 19 deletion (ex19del) or exon 21

substitution (Leu858Arg) mutation, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

performance status of 0 or 1, and no CNS metastases. We randomly assigned

eligible patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral erlotinib (150 mg/day) plus

either intravenous ramucirumab (10 mg/kg) or matching placebo once every 2 weeks.

Randomisation was done by an interactive web response system with a

computer-generated sequence and stratified by sex, geographical region, EGFR

mutation type, and EGFR testing method. The primary endpoint was

investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat

population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of

study treatment. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02411448, and

is ongoing for long-term survival follow-up.

FINDINGS: Between Jan 28, 2016, and Feb 1, 2018, 449 eligible patients were

enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment with ramucirumab plus erlotinib

(n=224) or placebo plus erlotinib (n=225). Median duration of follow-up was 20·7

months (IQR 15·8-27·2). At the time of primary analysis, progression-free

survival was significantly longer in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group (19·4

months [95% CI 15·4-21·6]) than in the placebo plus erlotinib group (12·4 months

[11·0-13·5]), with a stratified hazard ratio of 0·59 (95% CI 0·46-0·76;

p<0·0001). Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 159 (72%)

of 221 patients in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group versus 121 (54%) of 225

in the placebo plus erlotinib group. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent

adverse events in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group were hypertension (52

[24%]; grade 3 only) and dermatitis acneiform (33 [15%]), and in the placebo plus

erlotinib group were dermatitis acneiform (20 [9%]) and increased alanine

aminotransferase (17 [8%]). Treatment-emergent serious adverse events were

reported in 65 (29%) of 221 patients in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group and

47 (21%) of 225 in the placebo plus erlotinib group. The most common serious

adverse events of any grade in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group were

pneumonia (seven [3%]) and cellulitis and pneumothorax (four [2%], each); the

most common in the placebo plus erlotinib group were pyrexia (four [2%]) and

pneumothorax (three [1%]). One on-study treatment-related death due to an adverse

event occurred (haemothorax after a thoracic drainage procedure for a pleural

empyema) in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group.

INTERPRETATION: Ramucirumab plus erlotinib demonstrated superior progression-free

survival compared with placebo plus erlotinib in patients with untreated

EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC. Safety was consistent with the safety profiles of

the individual compounds in advanced lung cancer. The RELAY regimen is a viable

new treatment option for the initial treatment of EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC.

FUNDING: Eli Lilly.

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30634-5

PMID: 31591063

5. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1681-1690. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30504-2. Epub 2019 Oct 3.

Lazertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung

cancer: results from the dose escalation and dose expansion parts of a

first-in-human, open-label, multicentre, phase 1-2 study.

Ahn MJ(1), Han JY(2), Lee KH(3), Kim SW(4), Kim DW(5), Lee YG(6), Cho EK(7), Kim

JH(8), Lee GW(9), Lee JS(10), Min YJ(11), Kim JS(12), Lee SS(13), Kim HR(14),

Hong MH(14), Ahn JS(1), Sun JM(1), Kim HT(2), Lee DH(4), Kim S(15), Cho BC(16).

Author information:

(1)Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical

Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

(2)Center for Lung Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer

Center, Goyang, South Korea.

(3)Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Chungbuk National

University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju,

South Korea.

Erratum in

Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):e70.

BACKGROUND: Patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) given

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) inevitably become resistant to

first-generation or second-generation drugs. We assessed the safety,

tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and activity of lazertinib-an irreversible,

third-generation, mutant-selective, EGFR TKI-in patients with advanced NSCLC

progressing after EGFR TKI therapy.

METHODS: This first-in-human, open-label, multicentre, phase 1-2 study had three

parts: dose escalation, dose expansion, and dose extension; here, we report

results on dose escalation and dose expansion. The study was done in 14 hospitals

in Korea. Eligible patients were aged 20 years or older and had advanced NSCLC

harbouring an activating EGFR mutation and progressing after first-generation or

second-generation EGFR TKI treatment, a defined tumour T790M mutation status, an

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, at least one

measurable extracranial lesion, defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria

in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, and adequate organ function. Patients were

enrolled to seven dose-escalation cohorts according to a rolling six design; five

cohorts were expanded. Patients were given oral lazertinib 20 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg,

120 mg, 160 mg, 240 mg, or 320 mg once daily continuously in 21-day cycles.

Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability and secondary endpoints included

objective response in evaluable patients. This study is registered with

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03046992, and the phase 2 extension study is ongoing.

FINDINGS: Between Feb 15, 2017, and May 28, 2018, 127 patients were enrolled into

the dose escalation group (n=38) and dose expansion group (n=89). No

dose-limiting toxicities occurred. There was no dose-dependent increase in

adverse events. The most commonly reported adverse events were grade 1-2 rash or

acne (in 38 [30%] of 127 patients) and pruritus (in 34 [27%]). Grade 3 or grade 4

adverse events occurred in 20 (16%) patients, with the most common being grade 3

pneumonia (four [3%]). Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in

four (3%) patients; treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in six

patients (5%). There were no adverse events with an outcome of death and no

treatment-related deaths. The proportion of patients achieving an objective

response by independent central review assessment was 69 (54%; 95% CI 46-63) of

127.

INTERPRETATION: Lazertinib had a tolerable safety profile and showed promosing

clinical activity in patients with NSCLC progressing on or after EGFR TKI

therapy. Our findings provide a rationale for further clinical investigations.

FUNDING: Yuhan Corporation.

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30504-2

PMID: 31587882

6. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 10;38(8):793-803. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01494. Epub 2019 Dec 27.

Randomized Phase III Study of Continuation Maintenance Bevacizumab With or

Without Pemetrexed in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: COMPASS

(WJOG5610L).

Seto T(1), Azuma K(2), Yamanaka T(3), Sugawara S(4), Yoshioka H(5), Wakuda K(6),

Atagi S(7), Iwamoto Y(8), Hayashi H(9), Okamoto I(10), Saka H(11), Mitsuoka

S(12), Fujimoto D(13), Nishino K(14), Horiike A(15), Daga H(16), Sone T(17),

Yamamoto N(18), Nakagawa K(19), Nakanishi Y(20).

Author information:

(1)National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.

(2)Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.

(3)Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.

PURPOSE: Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been shown to

benefit from maintenance therapy. COMPASS evaluated the efficacy and safety of

bevacizumab with or without pemetrexed as continuation maintenance therapy after

carboplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab induction therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated advanced nonsquamous NSCLC without

confirmed EGFR 19 deletion or L858R mutation received first-line therapy with

carboplatin area under the curve 6, pemetrexed 500 mg/m2, and bevacizumab 15

mg/kg once every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. Patients without disease progression

during the induction therapy were randomly assigned 1:1 for maintenance therapy

with pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg or bevacizumab 15 mg/kg once

every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end

point was overall survival (OS) after random assignment.

RESULTS: Between September 2010 and September 2015, 907 patients received

induction therapy. Of those, 599 were randomly assigned: 298 received pemetrexed

plus bevacizumab, and 301 received bevacizumab. The median OS was 23.3 v 19.6

months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.05; 1-sided stratified

log-rank P = .069). In the wild-type EGFR subset, the OS HR was 0.82 (95% CI,

0.68 to 0.99; 1-sided unstratified log-rank P = .020). The median

progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.7 v 4.0 months (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.57 to

0.79; 2-sided log-rank P < .001). The safety data were consistent with previous

reports of treatment regimens.

CONCLUSION: In terms of the primary end point of OS, no statistically significant

benefit was observed; however, PFS in the total patient population and OS in

patients with wild-type EGFR was prolonged with the addition of pemetrexed to

bevacizumab maintenance therapy.

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.01494

PMID: 31880966

7. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 1;38(7):706-714. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01162. Epub 2019 Dec 16.

Long-Term Results of NRG Oncology RTOG 0617: Standard- Versus High-Dose

Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Cetuximab for Unresectable Stage III

Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Bradley JD(1), Hu C(2)(3), Komaki RR(4), Masters GA(5), Blumenschein GR(4),

Schild SE(6), Bogart JA(7), Forster KM(8), Magliocco AM(9), Kavadi VS(10),

Narayan S(11), Iyengar P(12), Robinson CG(13), Wynn RB(14), Koprowski CD(15),

Olson MR(16), Meng J(17), Paulus R(2), Curran WJ Jr(18), Choy H(12).

Author information:

(1)Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

(2)NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Pittsburgh, PA.

(3)Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

PURPOSE: RTOG 0617 compared standard-dose (SD; 60 Gy) versus high-dose (HD; 74

Gy) radiation with concurrent chemotherapy and determined the efficacy of

cetuximab for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS: The study used a 2 × 2 factorial design with radiation dose as 1 factor

and cetuximab as the other, with a primary end point of overall survival (OS).

RESULTS: Median follow-up was 5.1 years. There were 3 grade 5 adverse events

(AEs) in the SD arm and 9 in the HD arm. Treatment-related grade ≥3 dysphagia and

esophagitis occurred in 3.2% and 5.0% of patients in the SD arm v 12.1% and 17.4%

in the HD arm, respectively (P = .0005 and < .0001). There was no difference in

pulmonary toxicity, with grade ≥3 AEs in 20.6% and 19.3%. Median OS was 28.7 v

20.3 months (P = .0072) in the SD and HD arms, respectively, 5-year OS and

progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 32.1% and 23% and 18.3% and 13% (P =

.055), respectively. Factors associated with improved OS on multivariable

analysis were standard radiation dose, tumor location, institution accrual

volume, esophagitis/dysphagia, planning target volume and heart V5. The use of

cetuximab conferred no survival benefit at the expense of increased toxicity. The

prior signal of benefit in patients with higher H scores was no longer apparent.

The progression rate within 1 month of treatment completion in the SD arm was

4.6%. For comparison purposes, the resultant 2-year OS and PFS rates allowing for

that dropout rate were 59.6% and 30.7%, respectively, in the SD arms.

CONCLUSION: A 60-Gy radiation dose with concurrent chemotherapy should remain the

standard of care, with the OS rate being among the highest reported in the

literature for stage III NSCLC. Cetuximab had no effect on OS. The 2-year OS

rates in the control arm are similar to the PACIFIC trial.

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.01162

PMCID: PMC7048161 [Available on 2021-03-01]

PMID: 31841363

8. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 20;38(6):613-622. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00816. Epub 2019 Dec 12.

Randomized Phase III Study of Ganetespib, a Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibitor, With

Docetaxel Versus Docetaxel in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (GALAXY-2).

Pillai RN(1), Fennell DA(2), Kovcin V(3), Ciuleanu TE(4), Ramlau R(5), Kowalski

D(6), Schenker M(7), Yalcin I(8), Teofilovici F(8), Vukovic VM(8), Ramalingam

SS(1).

Author information:

(1)Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

(2)University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.

(3)Clinical Hospital Centre Be?anijska Beograd, Belgrade, Serbia.

PURPOSE: Ganetespib, a highly potent heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, blocks

multiple oncogenic pathways, resulting in antitumor activity. We evaluated the

combination of ganetespib and docetaxel for second-line therapy of patients with

advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this international phase III trial, patients with stage

IIIB or IV adenocarcinoma diagnosed > 6 months before study entry and 1 prior

systemic therapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to ganetespib 150 mg/m2 on days 1

and 15 with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 21-day cycle or to docetaxel alone.

The primary end point was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS: Of 677 enrolled patients, 335 were randomly assigned to ganetespib and

docetaxel and 337 were assigned to docetaxel. The trial was stopped early as a

result of futility at a planned interim analysis. The median OS time was 10.9

months (95% CI, 9.0 to 12.3 months) in the ganetespib and docetaxel arm compared

with 10.5 months (95% CI, 8.6 to 12.2 months) in docetaxel arm (hazard ratio

[HR], 1.11; 95% CI, 0.899 to 1.372; P = .329). Median progression-free survival

was 4.2 months in the ganetespib and docetaxel arm and 4.3 months in the

docetaxel arm (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.403; P = .119). The addition of

ganetespib did not improve outcomes compared with docetaxel alone for any

secondary end point, including survival in the elevated lactate dehydrogenase or

EGFR and ALK wild-type populations. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event in

both arms was neutropenia (30.9% with ganetespib and docetaxel v 25% with

docetaxel).

CONCLUSION: The addition of ganetespib to docetaxel did not result in improved

survival for salvage therapy of patients with advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma.

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.00816

PMID: 31829907

9. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 1;38(7):753-766. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02748. Epub 2019 Dec 12.

Lung Cancer Surveillance After Definitive Curative-Intent Therapy: ASCO

Guideline.

Schneider BJ(1), Ismaila N(2), Aerts J(3), Chiles C(4), Daly ME(5), Detterbeck

FC(6), Hearn JWD(1), Katz SI(7), Leighl NB(8), Levy B(9), Meyers B(10), Murgu

S(11), Nekhlyudov L(12), Santos ES(13), Singh N(14), Tashbar J(15), Yankelevitz

D(16), Altorki N(17).

Author information:

(1)University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.

(2)American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.

(3)Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

PURPOSE: To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing clinicians on

radiographic imaging and biomarker surveillance strategies after definitive

curative-intent therapy in patients with stage I-III non-small-cell lung cancer

(NSCLC) and SCLC.

METHODS: ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery,

radiation oncology, pulmonary, radiology, primary care, and advocacy experts to

conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses,

randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative

observational studies published from 2000 through 2019. Outcomes of interest

included survival, disease-free or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life.

Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop

evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS: The literature search identified 14 relevant studies to inform the

evidence base for this guideline.

RECOMMENDATIONS: Patients should undergo surveillance imaging for recurrence

every 6 months for 2 years and then annually for detection of new primary lung

cancers. Chest computed tomography imaging is the optimal imaging modality for

surveillance. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography

imaging should not be used as a surveillance tool. Surveillance imaging may not

be offered to patients who are clinically unsuitable for or unwilling to accept

further treatment. Age should not preclude surveillance imaging. Circulating

biomarkers should not be used as a surveillance strategy for detection of

recurrence. Brain magnetic resonance imaging should not be used for routine

surveillance in stage I-III NSCLC but may be used every 3 months for the first

year and every 6 months for the second year in patients with stage I-III

small-cell lung cancer who have undergone curative-intent treatment.

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.02748

PMID: 31829901

10. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 10;38(5):488-495. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00931. Epub 2019 Dec 11.

Osimertinib for Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Uncommon EGFR

Mutations: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase II Trial (KCSG-LU15-09).

Cho JH(1), Lim SH(2), An HJ(3), Kim KH(4), Park KU(5), Kang EJ(6), Choi YH(7),

Ahn MS(8), Lee MH(9), Sun JM(1), Lee SH(1), Ahn JS(1), Park K(1), Ahn MJ(1).

Author information:

(1)Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul,

Republic of Korea.

(2)Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.

(3)St Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of

Korea.

PURPOSE: Approximately 10% of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor

(EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbor uncommon

mutations. Here, we report the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in patients

with NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations.

PATIENT AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase II

study in Korea. Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic or recurrent

NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations other than the exon 19 deletion, L858R and T790M

mutations, and exon 20 insertion were eligible for the study. The primary end

point of objective response rate was assessed every 6 weeks by Response

Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Secondary end points

were progression-free survival, overall survival, duration of response, and

safety.

RESULTS: Between March 2016 and October 2017, 37 patients were enrolled. All were

evaluable except one patient who withdrew consent after starting treatment.

Median age was 60 years, and 22 (61%) were male. Among patients, 61% received

osimertinib as first-line therapy. The mutations identified were G719X (n = 19;

53%), followed by L861Q (n = 9; 25%), S768I (n = 8; 22%), and others (n = 4;

11%). Objective response rate was 50% (18 of 36 patients; 95% CI, 33% to 67%).

Median progression-free survival was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.9 to 10.5 months), and

median overall survival was not reached. Median duration of response was 11.2

months (95% CI, 7.7 to 14.7 months). Adverse events of any grade were rash (n =

11; 31%), pruritus (n = 9; 25%), decreased appetite (n = 9; 25%), diarrhea (n =

8; 22%), and dyspnea (n = 8; 22%), but all adverse events were manageable.

CONCLUSION: Osimertinib demonstrated favorable activity with manageable toxicity

in patients with NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations.

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.00931

PMID: 31825714

11. Nat Commun. 2019 Dec 6;10(1):5604. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13419-4.

Reactive metabolite production is a targetable liability of glycolytic metabolism

in lung cancer.

Luengo A(1)(2), Abbott KL(1)(2), Davidson SM(1)(2)(3), Hosios AM(1)(2), Faubert

B(4), Chan SH(5), Freinkman E(5), Zacharias LG(4), Mathews TP(4)(6), Clish CB(3),

DeBerardinis RJ(4)(6)(7), Lewis CA(5), Vander Heiden MG(8)(9)(10)(11).

Author information:

(1)Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of

Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.

(2)Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA,

02139, USA.

(3)Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.

Increased glucose uptake and metabolism is a prominent phenotype of most cancers,

but efforts to clinically target this metabolic alteration have been challenging.

Here, we present evidence that lactoylglutathione (LGSH), a byproduct of

methylglyoxal detoxification, is elevated in both human and murine non-small cell

lung cancers (NSCLC). Methylglyoxal is a reactive metabolite byproduct of

glycolysis that reacts non-enzymatically with nucleophiles in cells, including

basic amino acids, and reduces cellular fitness. Detoxification of methylglyoxal

requires reduced glutathione (GSH), which accumulates to high levels in NSCLC

relative to normal lung. Ablation of the methylglyoxal detoxification enzyme

glyoxalase I (Glo1) potentiates methylglyoxal sensitivity and reduces tumor

growth in mice, arguing that targeting pathways involved in detoxification of

reactive metabolites is an approach to exploit the consequences of increased

glucose metabolism in cancer.

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13419-4

PMCID: PMC6898239

PMID: 31811141 [Indexed for MEDLINE]

12. Nat Commun. 2019 Dec 6;10(1):5587. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13441-6.

Mapping lung cancer epithelial-mesenchymal transition states and trajectories

with single-cell resolution.

Karacosta LG(1)(2), Anchang B(1)(2), Ignatiadis N(3), Kimmey SC(4), Benson JA(5),

Shrager JB(5), Tibshirani R(1)(3), Bendall SC(4), Plevritis SK(6)(7).

Author information:

(1)Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.

(2)Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.

(3)Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.

Elucidating the spectrum of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and

mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) states in clinical samples promises

insights on cancer progression and drug resistance. Using mass cytometry

time-course analysis, we resolve lung cancer EMT states through TGFβ-treatment

and identify, through TGFβ-withdrawal, a distinct MET state. We demonstrate

significant differences between EMT and MET trajectories using a computational

tool (TRACER) for reconstructing trajectories between cell states. In addition,

we construct a lung cancer reference map of EMT and MET states referred to as the

EMT-MET PHENOtypic STAte MaP (PHENOSTAMP). Using a neural net algorithm, we

project clinical samples onto the EMT-MET PHENOSTAMP to characterize their

phenotypic profile with single-cell resolution in terms of our in vitro EMT-MET

analysis. In summary, we provide a framework to phenotypically characterize

clinical samples in the context of in vitro EMT-MET findings which could help

assess clinical relevance of EMT in cancer in future studies.

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13441-6

PMCID: PMC6898514

PMID: 31811131 [Indexed for MEDLINE]

13. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 20;38(6):538-547. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00457. Epub 2019 Dec 6.

Osimertinib in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive

Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Leptomeningeal Metastases: The BLOOM Study.

Yang JCH(1), Kim SW(2), Kim DW(3), Lee JS(4), Cho BC(5), Ahn JS(6), Lee DH(2),

Kim TM(3), Goldman JW(7), Natale RB(8), Brown AP(9), Collins B(9), Chmielecki

J(10), Vishwanathan K(1)(10), Mendoza-Naranjo A(9), Ahn MJ(6).

Author information:

(1)National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Republic of China.

(2)Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

(3)Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

PURPOSE: In this phase I study (BLOOM), osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal

growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), was evaluated in

patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LMs) from EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) advanced

non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease had progressed on previous

EGFR-TKI therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with cytologically confirmed LM received

osimertinib 160 mg once daily. Objectives were to assess confirmed objective

response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS),

overall survival (OS), pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety. Additional efficacy

evaluations included changes from baseline in CSF cytology and neurologic

examination. Measurable lesions were assessed by investigator according to RECIST

version 1.1. LMs were assessed by neuroradiologic blinded central independent

review (BICR) according to Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology LM radiologic

criteria and by investigator.

RESULTS: Forty-one patients were enrolled. LM ORR and DoR by neuroradiologic BICR

were 62% (95% CI, 45% to 78%) and 15.2 months (95% CI, 7.5 to 17.5 months),

respectively. Overall, ORR by investigator was 41% (95% CI, 26% to 58%), and

median DoR was 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 16.5 months). Median

investigator-assessed PFS was 8.6 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 13.7 months) with 78%

maturity; median OS was 11.0 months (95% CI, 8.0 to 18.0 months) with 68%

maturity. CSF tumor cell clearance was confirmed in 11 (28%; 95% CI, 15% to 44%)

of 40 patients. Neurologic function was improved in 12 (57%) of 21 patients with

an abnormal assessment at baseline. The adverse event and PK profiles were

consistent with previous reports for osimertinib.

CONCLUSION: Osimertinib showed meaningful therapeutic efficacy in the CNS and a

manageable safety profile at 160 mg once daily in patients with EGFRm NSCLC and

LM.

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.00457

PMCID: PMC7030895 [Available on 2021-02-20]

PMID: 31809241

14. Genes Dev. 2019 Dec 1;33(23-24):1718-1738. doi: 10.1101/gad.328336.119. Epub 2019 Nov 14.

The KDM5A/RBP2 histone demethylase represses NOTCH signaling to sustain

neuroendocrine differentiation and promote small cell lung cancer tumorigenesis.

Oser MG(1)(2)(3), Sabet AH(1), Gao W(1)(3), Chakraborty AA(1)(3), Schinzel AC(1),

Jennings RB(1)(4), Fonseca R(1), Bonal DM(1)(5), Booker MA(6), Flaifel A(1)(4),

Novak JS(1)(4), Christensen CL(1), Zhang H(7), Herbert ZT(8), Tolstorukov MY(6),

Buss EJ(1)(9), Wong KK(7), Bronson RT(10), Nguyen QD(1)(5), Signoretti S(1)(4),

Kaelin WG Jr(1)(3)(9).

Author information:

(1)Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and

Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.

(2)Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston,

Massachusetts 02215, USA.

(3)Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School,

Massachusetts 02115, USA.

More than 90% of small cell lung cancers (SCLCs) harbor loss-of-function

mutations in the tumor suppressor gene RB1 The canonical function of the RB1 gene

product, pRB, is to repress the E2F transcription factor family, but pRB also

functions to regulate cellular differentiation in part through its binding to the

histone demethylase KDM5A (also known as RBP2 or JARID1A). We show that KDM5A

promotes SCLC proliferation and SCLC's neuroendocrine differentiation phenotype

in part by sustaining expression of the neuroendocrine transcription factor

ASCL1. Mechanistically, we found that KDM5A sustains ASCL1 levels and

neuroendocrine differentiation by repressing NOTCH2 and NOTCH target genes. To

test the role of KDM5A in SCLC tumorigenesis in vivo, we developed a

CRISPR/Cas9-based mouse model of SCLC by delivering an adenovirus (or an

adeno-associated virus [AAV]) that expresses Cre recombinase and sgRNAs targeting

Rb1, Tp53, and Rbl2 into the lungs of Lox-Stop-Lox Cas9 mice. Coinclusion of a

KDM5A sgRNA decreased SCLC tumorigenesis and metastasis, and the SCLCs that

formed despite the absence of KDM5A had higher NOTCH activity compared to KDM5A

+/+ SCLCs. This work establishes a role for KDM5A in SCLC tumorigenesis and

suggests that KDM5 inhibitors should be explored as treatments for SCLC.

© 2019 Oser et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

DOI: 10.1101/gad.328336.119

PMCID: PMC6942053 [Available on 2020-06-01]

PMID: 31727771 [Indexed for MEDLINE]

下一篇: No.23